Anthony Canales is the President of the
San Fernando Valley NRA Member’s Council.
He works as a Quality Control Manager in Glendale, California. He is married with one son.
The opinions expressed in 'News Briefs' belong solely to the author
and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National
Rifle Association of America or the NRA Members' Councils of California.
Kind of brings new meaning to the term "German Engineering".
In other news...:
Gypsies, Tramps, and Thieves:
Face it, UCLA Law gives great symposia. And on January 23, 2009,
there was a great one.
After all, where else do lowly firearms rights volunteers get to mingle with
some of the intellectual greats of the Great Patriotic War to Preserve
Firearms Rights and Peeve Off Commie Pinkos? Folks like Gary Kleck, Joyce
Lee Malcolm, and Eugene Volokh?
Not only that, but we got a free lunch too, just for the price of showing up
and having to stomach the theories and expressed desires of those who would
steal our rights and heritage.
In reality, it was not such an inexpensive price. Surely there has to be an
OSHA regulation somewhere denoting the LD-50 of exposure to the likes of
Dennis Hennigan, who apparently does not believe that suicides can be done
without a firearm present (Or that distraught teens have not ever substituted
alcohol, pills, bridges, tall buildings, or razor blades for the family
handgun as the opportunity and desperation arose...).
Still, if one could somehow keep the arugula, roast beef, pilaf and
cheesecake down after listening to how Hennigan intends to continue failed
"supply-side" measures designed to disarm us all, then one might be ready to
acknowledge that it's going to be raining bandini from the Beltway in short
order.
After all, it was Hennigan and his fellow gungrabbers Jens Ludwig and Andrew
Samaha who discussed (with a draft-only, not ready for
quotation/non-peer-reviewed study, no less) how they were going to continue
lobbying for regulating each and every firearms transaction, firearms
rationing in general, and empowering the ATF to finish off every legal
dealer from Kittery to Nome.
Face it, elections do have consequences. And no amount of wishful thinking,
nor the sportsman-like sentiment of "wanting Obama to succeed" in bringing
about Socialist policies of disarmament (among other things) will be
acceptable to those willing to test "conclusions" in a meaningful way. It
ultimately may require cranking the pinkies of every last Blue Dog in the
Congress, but suffice it to say that the Second Amendment will be preserved by
any means necessary.
Stay tuned.
Thank
God For Mad Magazine:
For
all of us who have had it up to the eyebrows with "Obamamania" (Not a
Presidency, but an Incredible Simulation) and the claims of approval ratings
higher than the Van Allen Belt (and just as toxic...), the folks at
Mad Magazine have introduced perhaps some timely levity.
At
the very least, they are posing the interesting conundrum as to whether the
President's "habit" constitutes an unsuitable role model for Mad's
subscriber base (not to mention the hordes of the nation's youth that are
known to cluster around the magazine stands of 7-11's across the land). Or,
perhaps, some much needed advertising for a tobacco industry painted with the
red-dot of Donkey Party tax gatherers deep into the money hunt. Hopefully we
will all be able to laugh at this, when it is said and done. In the mean
time, Mad Magazine can be purchased at news stands all over. Buy today.
Well, at least
someone is on top of things. Perhaps we all will be able to sell the ping
pong paddles in lieu of pay, or in lieu of those IOU's they are talking
about handing out.
Fresh off of Chuck Michel's "ass-whuppin" of the City of San
Francisco over the right to keep and bear arms while one is a tenant in
public housing, the Legal Beagles of the Bay have decided to try to abrogate
the First Amendment instead.
In
a story by C. W. Nevius in the San Francisco Chronicle, it seems that the
city has decided to declare various areas of the city as "drug free zones"
based upon the say-so of city officials. Once declared, police will have
discretion to keep folks from "congregating" for the purposes of scoring
drug buys.
Unfortunately, congregating for the purposes of purchasing illegal narcotics
looks a lot like waiting for one's significant other to return after parking
in the notoriously crowded Tenderloin. Or congregating for one's barbershop
quartet members just prior to an impromptu street concert. Or even standing
as a group on a corner trying to decide between "Thai" or "Italian" (No, I
won't even go there...Wouldn't be prudent...). In turn, that makes the
possibilities of camouflage for enterprising dope peddlers endless.
It will be interesting to see if the ACLU steps up for the First Amendment
like the NRA has stood for the Second. But this continued habit of tossing
out the Bill of Rights by the City Fathers of Frisco needs to be
reconsidered if the City By The Bay is going to retain it's civil liberties
bona fides and Secret Decoder Ring. In the post-Heller environment,
it is not enough to say that Newsom and Co. are just borrowing from the
"experience" of Washington DC. Of course, if the ACLU thinks that perhaps
they will "lose" such a case, and are incapable of defending the Bill of
Rights, then perhaps they might need a new batch of attorneys. Give us a
call Gavin, let's do lunch. Perhaps we can pass on some referrals.