April 26, 2005
Well folks, our AG "Mr. Bill" Lockyer has
gone and done it again:
SB 357- The Press Conference:
If one moseys over to the AG's own website,
one sees the official press release touting the latest risky (privacy goes out
the window on this one) scheme from the Work Place Safety For Criminals Lobby.
In a nutshell, Mr. Bill and the usual
suspects are proclaiming that a system that "registers" every pistol
ammunition purchase in the state will somehow magically lead investigators to
the perp (Other people's ammo is probably going to be the hottest item on
future B&E specialists' lists, unless importation of illegal, non-serialized
ammo turns out to be cheaper).
Unfortunately for Mr. Bill, the Powerpoint
demonstration that went with the presentation shows how serial numbers marked
only onto the base of lead and copper-jacketed bullets will survive impact
with a car door as test target. It's unfortunate because projectiles not
marked in such a way as to appear to be serialized prior to discharge
do not meet with the requirements of SB 357 (Section 12314 d) 4) ). If the
Powerpoint presentation is a correct representation of what was done, the
"test" bullets were not marked on surfaces that would be visible in an
assembled, pre-fired cartridge.
To reiterate, the bullets used by both the San
Bernardino Sheriff's Department (thanks guys) and the DOJ in their
"validation" of micro-embossing methods were non-compliant with the
requirements of SB 357.
Of course, embossed markings that are deep
enough to survive the gouging of lands in pistol barrels are more than likely
to have a negative effect on performance later on (Problems could vary from
accuracy reduction for Olympic-class .22 ammo to jacket delamination of police
issue hollowpoint, something that should thrill the trauma surgery crowd
something fierce).
And if the pictures noted in the DOJ Powerpoint
presentation are of any indication of the size of the identifying marks
expected to be on the ammunition of the future, the claims of visual "unaided"
inspection appear to be specious (The pictures clearly appear to be the
product of a camera with a "macro" lens). Given the small sample sizes (22
rounds fired by San Bernardino deputies, and 181 rounds fired by DOJ
personnel) and the apparent lack of variance of angle of impact and through
different media, it is hard to imagine the real world applicability of the
DOJ's "testing" in this case.
Of course, this style of marking does not
appear to be comparable when used with smaller caliber ammunition (The sample
round fired appear to be .38 caliber and 9 mm caliber, both projectiles of
which have cross-sections in the 0.355" range. .22 caliber ammunition is that
much smaller, and subject to more tumbling which would deface surfaces bearing
serial numbers.).
The battle against SB 357 will be one closely
linked to supporting Mr. Bill Lockyer's run for the governorship. Given that
Governor Schwarzennegger is sitting on a $ 40 million campaign warchest, the
"encouragement" coming from Donkey Central and the Lamestream Media for the
Governor to be a "one termer" seems premature in the least. Rejection of SB
357 in the Legislature will save the Democrat Party from the potential
ignominy of running the "Claymation Man" against the Governator in 2006. Stay
tuned.
Story elements can be found at:
SFVMC-NRA
Copyright 2005 Anthony Canales
All
rights reserved.