The Unknown Ordinance: Mandatory Firearm Theft/Loss Reporting They say it's a "tool" Law Enforcement wants, even needs, but... April 2, 2007 The Anti-gun lobby often twists facts and distributes outright lies in trying to promote their failed agenda. For example, they often claim that gun control enjoys the support of law enforcement when the truth is just the opposite (see Police Survey Reveals Attitudes Regarding "Assault Weapons") Proponents of 'Mandatory Reporting of Loss/Stolen Firearms' claim the ordinance is an important tool in the tracking of street firearms and straw puchasers. In reality, in those cities that have passed this bad idea, senior officers responsible for prosecution of firearms violations don't even know it exists. The following email was received via the CalNRA.com Contact Page: ----- Original Message -----The message was forwarded to NRA Staff and Attorneys, who responded with the appropriate legal references. The same police officer then replied: From: [Name and Email address withheld] In considering this ordinance at the present time, Sacramento has learned of the complete lack of subsequent prosecution in areas that have passed it. In spite of such glaring evidence, some members of the Sacramento City Council continue to ignore their own reseach and vote to the detriment of their constituents in supporting this flawed legislation. See Sacramento ignores own research in pressing gun control . A Sacramento City Council Meeting of December 5, 2006 is highlighted in a video by the author titled "The Anatomy of Gun Control", available here. ONE-CLICK service has been established to the Sacramento City Council, making it very easy for you to forward on your personal comments HERE. You may track this issue HERE.
Mike Haas |
![]() |
|
|